Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 2:32 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7 posts ] 
 Can someone tell me if this sign is legal? Thanks! 
Author Message
 Post subject: Can someone tell me if this sign is legal? Thanks!
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:04 am 
On time out
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:36 am
Posts: 228
Image

_________________
On probation; can't post until at least 5/31/2009


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:40 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:04 pm
Posts: 1682
Location: Wright County
It needs to be 181"sq. with 1.5 ariel font IRRC. So it looks to be.


NOW whether or not it's compliant doesn't matter, they've stated their opinion on the topic. Just leave them a "no guns=no $$$" card.

I will stronly urge you not to point out to them that signs may or may not be compliant, and that they carry no weight of law. There is no benifit to the community by doing so. It will only embolden the anti's to get legislation passed that makes the signs carry the weight of law.

_________________
Get Off My Lawn.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:59 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
mnglocker wrote:
It needs to be 181"sq. with 1.5 ariel font IRRC. So it looks to be.


187 square inches. :)
Quote:

NOW whether or not it's compliant doesn't matter, they've stated their opinion on the topic. Just leave them a "no guns=no $$$" card.

I will stronly urge you not to point out to them that signs may or may not be compliant, and that they carry no weight of law. There is no benifit to the community by doing so. It will only embolden the anti's to get legislation passed that makes the signs carry the weight of law.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Last edited by Andrew Rothman on Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:00 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:04 pm
Posts: 1682
Location: Wright County
Andrew Rothman wrote:
mnglocker wrote:
It needs to be 181"sq. with 1.5 ariel font IRRC. So it looks to be.

187 square inches. :)

Quote:
NOW whether or not it's compliant doesn't matter, they've stated their opinion on the topic. Just leave them a "no guns=no $$$" card.

I will stronly urge you not to point out to them that signs may or may not be compliant, and that they carry no weight of law. There is no benifit to the community by doing so. It will only embolden the anti's to get legislation passed that makes the signs carry the weight of law.



Danke Sir. 8)

_________________
Get Off My Lawn.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:05 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:53 pm
Posts: 1421
Location: South Minneapolis (East of Lake Nokomis)
The magic number 187 sq. in. is 11" x 17", standard tabloid paper size, so that's what you usually see, though I assume 13.6747943" square would be legal.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:28 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:11 am
Posts: 572
Location: West of Hope, MN (S. Central MN)
Quote:
I assume 13.6747943" square would be legal


Sorry Pat, 13.6747943 square is only 186.9999991 square inches. Not the required 187 square inches.


Last edited by westhope on Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:59 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:53 pm
Posts: 1421
Location: South Minneapolis (East of Lake Nokomis)
westhope wrote:
Quote:
I assume 13.6747943" square would be legal

Sorry Pat, 13.6747943 square us only 186.9999991 square inches. Not the required 187 square inches.

I was allowing for expansion due to, um, radiosotope transmutation.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group