Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:27 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 One way to get the signs removed 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:24 pm 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:20 am
Posts: 1317
Location: Racine, MN
It is always great to see someone enlightened with education. :)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:32 am 
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:27 pm
Posts: 359
Location: Shakopee
I wonder if this would work for employees if the company policy could be changed.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:06 am 
Designated waste of protoplasm
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 1807
Location: Western Burbs of MPLS
pezhead wrote:
I wonder if this would work for employees if the company policy could be changed.


Sure it would -

Petition for a change in company policy - if the employer is not amicable to the change - you could be looking for a new job.

I have a letter that I may out to local retailers with signage - Stating something like - "by the act of banning weapons on your business premises - you guarantee my safety and the safety of others from an act of Violence 100% - in doing such you have acted affirmatively to deny my rights and the rights of others to the right of self defense."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:34 pm 
Site Admin

Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:02 pm
Posts: 818
Location: downtown Mpls
Srigs wrote:
Wouldn't a note to the Bloomington Police about the MOA do the trick and put pressure on them to remove the meaningless signs. :wink:

There's no law against meaningless signs.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:34 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:37 am
Posts: 606
But but .. you can't carry at the Mall because ot the MALL RULES. Isn't that enough? Its the rules!

http://www.mallofamerica.com/about_moa_ ... rules.aspx

Funny how they also ban "bulletproof vests" :shock:


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:27 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:19 pm
Posts: 265
Location: MN
squib_joe wrote:
But but .. you can't carry at the Mall because ot the MALL RULES. Isn't that enough? Its the rules!

http://www.mallofamerica.com/about_moa_ ... rules.aspx

Funny how they also ban "bulletproof vests" :shock:


Interesting!!!!

It's interesting that they say:

"Guns are banned on these premises"

under the heading:

"Violations of the Law"

Soo, if a person has a p2c, no problem, right? :?

Not to mention the whole thing about landlords posting.

_________________
Most problems are caused by solutions


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:47 am 
Wise Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm
Posts: 2782
Location: St. Paul
nyffman wrote:
It's interesting that they say:

"Guns are banned on these premises"

under the heading:

"Violations of the Law"

Soo, if a person has a p2c, no problem, right? :?


It would seem so. Any ambiguities should be construed against the drafter of the private "rule."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:56 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:17 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Meeker Co., MN
Quote:
The commission of any act defined by Federal, State or local ordinances as a criminal act is prohibited.


Now, I have to ask, is it really necessary to prohibit criminal acts? sheesh :roll: :roll: ( I know, lots of places do this, but really....)

_________________
1 of 55153
"The attitude of people associating guns with nothing but crime, that is what has to be changed. I grew up at a time when people were not afraid of people with firearms." —Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
Sierra Trading - Firearms Sales, Service and Training


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:17 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 1132
Location: Prior Lake, MN
KonaSeven wrote:
Quote:
The commission of any act defined by Federal, State or local ordinances as a criminal act is prohibited.


Now, I have to ask, is it really necessary to prohibit criminal acts? sheesh :roll: :roll: ( I know, lots of places do this, but really....)



I suppose it helps some of us to be reminded from time to time that it's illegal to break the law.

As Ron White says, "You can't fix stupid".

_________________
Brewman


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group