Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:50 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 10 posts ] 
 North Regional Library, Minneapolis 
Author Message
 Post subject: North Regional Library, Minneapolis
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 6:58 am 
Raving Moderate
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:46 pm
Posts: 1292
Location: Minneapolis
Just noticed yesterday that North Regional Library in Minneapolis (corner of Lowry and Fremont in North Minneapolis) now has the standard non-compliant (not that they could be compliant in this case) "Hennepin County Bans Dangerous Weapons On These Premises" sign. My weapon is not dangerous, so I went in and returned my books. :)

I assume HC is going to "post" all Minneapolis libraries now that they've been assimilated... :roll:

_________________
I'm liberal, pro-choice, and I carry a gun. Any questions?

My real name is Jeremiah (go figure). ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 7:28 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:13 pm
Posts: 1743
Location: Lakeville
I wish we had some sort of affordable recourse for crap like this.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:03 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:51 pm
Posts: 372
Location: Lakeville
Its a non compliant sign, but they know its non compliant..

If you look at the bottom, it mentions that permit holders are not covered by the sign. This is because of some actions of people on here against the county.

_________________
Certified MN Carry Permit instructor
check http://www.mncarrytraining.com/ for info

My Homebrew journal http://brew.goalie.cx


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 7:47 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:13 pm
Posts: 1743
Location: Lakeville
That just it. It isn't compliant, it isn't legal, and it does nothing but attempt to prevent legal CCW's from carrying there.
Not only that, but it gives other vistors (who have a worse understanding on the posting laws than the avg CCW) the impression that anyone they see with a gun on the premises is a "bad guy" and that should should be in fear or call 911.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:00 am 
Raving Moderate
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:46 pm
Posts: 1292
Location: Minneapolis
gaygoalie wrote:
Its a non compliant sign, but they know its non compliant..

If you look at the bottom, it mentions that permit holders are not covered by the sign. This is because of some actions of people on here against the county.


Actually, it doesn't mention permits or anything other than "dangerous weapons", unless it's in microprint somewhere.

The issue isn't the sign really (and I both remember and thank the guys who got the signs changed)- it's the principle of the County deciding to try to circumvent State law that's annoying... </rant> :)

_________________
I'm liberal, pro-choice, and I carry a gun. Any questions?

My real name is Jeremiah (go figure). ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:02 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
Which sign do they have up? This one?
Image

Or this one?
Image

The fine print:
Image

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:03 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:13 pm
Posts: 1743
Location: Lakeville
Looks like they put them up with velcro. They must be expecting to be forced to take them down.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 11:05 am 
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 4:48 pm
Posts: 358
SultanOfBrunei wrote:
I wish we had some sort of affordable recourse for crap like this.


Unless it has the disclaimer at the bottom specifically allowing permit holders to carry, it isn't an issue of being non-comliant. It is illegal.

Unless their is a court in the facility, and they are claiming that judge Burke's order is in effect, then it is illegal for the county to try to limit carrying there.

In that case you should be free to do a Reaver, open carry in the library, and force the issue.

I spoke at length on the phone with the guy hired to do security for Hennepin County (as a direct result of Reavers run in at the Edina library), I believe his name is Hunter. He was either: very dumb, willfully ignorant, or had an agenda he was not willing to come out with.

My complaint at that time was that the signs on the Southdale library (which has a court house next door) did not mention that they were banning guns per a court order, just that they were banned. They are in effect a trap, for a permit holder who thinks "this sign doesn't apply to me". I asked him repeatedly to post either the sign that allowed permit holders (the one I think is legally proper) or the sign that cites the court order (which I think is illegal at Southdale, because the court is in a seperate building, but would at least warn permit holders that the county would attempt to consider them in violation of the court order).

He flat out refused to do this, saying it was for the county Attorney to do. He also speculated that the wrong sign was very likely not put up on purpose, but was just the fault of a typically incompetent county employee.

I observed (to myself) that is was rather ironic to have a county employee refusing to do his job, who then referred to other county employees as being incompetent. :P

Bottom line... call the library and complain. Don't let them deter you with lame excuses. Continue to pursue it.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 2:57 pm 
Raving Moderate
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:46 pm
Posts: 1292
Location: Minneapolis
DeanC wrote:
Which sign do they have up?

Or this one?
Image


That one.

_________________
I'm liberal, pro-choice, and I carry a gun. Any questions?

My real name is Jeremiah (go figure). ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:45 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
Jeremiah wrote:
DeanC wrote:
Which sign do they have up?

Or this one?
Image


That one.

Then they are in violation of the law. There is no court facility in that building either, so that fallacious court order doesn't apply either.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 10 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group