Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 1:17 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 
 Open Carry in Wisc 
Author Message
 Post subject: Open Carry in Wisc
PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:56 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 91
Location: Lindstrom, MN
Anyone know what happens if one carries open around St. Croix Falls, Wisc?
I go to Walmat and Menards there and hate having to disarm every time we cross into Wis.

_________________
More Guns = Less Crime so I own many guns


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:39 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:36 am
Posts: 702
Location: St. Paulish
Legal sheet http://www.handgunlaw.us/states/wisconsin.pdf

Recent article http://www.lakelandtimes.com/main.asp?SectionID=9&SubSectionID=9&ArticleID=8970

_________________
Proud owner of 2 wonderful SGH holsters.
"If man will not work, he shall not eat" (2 Th 3:14)
"If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" -Jesus (Luke 22:36)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:46 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 3:02 am
Posts: 816
Location: South of the River Suburbs
Quote:
"They shortly discovered Brad had no criminal record and was lawfully openly carrying on his own property, but instead of releasing him and returning his weapon, they tried to figure out how to arrest him.


Wow. Painfully familiar. The "we don't enforce the law, we ARE the law" attitude. And people wonder why I don't trust (most) cops. This is why I keep a good lawyer on my cell phones speed dial.

_________________
My YouTube Videos

"We're either gonna be the best of friends or there's gonna be a whole lotta shootin' goin' on."

"I think it's a good thing for serving cops to mix with non-cops in a situation where they understand that they aren't in charge." -JoelR

"You'd be amazed at the things a bullet can stop." -Old Irish Proverb


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:21 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
Binky .357 wrote:
This is why I keep a good lawyer on my cell phones speed dial.


`Cause a gun-confiscating cop surely won't take your cel phone. ;)

Carry the card, too.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 11:01 pm 
Member

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:52 pm
Posts: 43
I hear ya, as I too have the same issues, living only 15 minutes away from St. Croix Falls. Do you disarm when you get there, or decide to just leave the gun at home? Niether option is any fun, but I would rather not leave my gun in the car.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 11:06 pm 
Member

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:52 pm
Posts: 43
GABCO I see you are from Lindstrom too.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Open-carry in Wisc re:Brad
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:54 am 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 91
Location: Lindstrom, MN
I only pick battles when I have a stratagy to win and I don't at this time.
I understand that the NRA will not help Brad - please correct me if I'm wrong. He can use all the help he can get. I can't imagine how violated he must feel as he was on his own property.

_________________
More Guns = Less Crime so I own many guns


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 7:21 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:02 pm
Posts: 571
Quote:
Indeed, Wisconsin remains one of only two states in the nation not to allow some form of concealed carry, and one of the most-repeated arguments used by concealed-carry opponents is that it is not necessary because citizens can openly carry their guns.

Then attorney general Jim Doyle used that precise argument before the state Supreme Court in Wisconsin v Hamdan, in which the state carved out a concealed weapon exemption for small business owners.

As governor, Doyle reportedly reiterated his belief at a Lake Delton press conference, in which The Wisconsin Dells Events quoted him as saying, "If you want to carry a gun in Wisconsin, wear it on your hip."


And in a follow-up piece found at http://www.lakelandtimes.com/main.asp?SectionID=9&SubSectionID=9&ArticleID=8985 we find out:

Quote:
As conflicts over of the open carry of firearms mushroom in the state, Wisconsin attorney general J.B. Van Hollen is declining to issue a legal opinion about whether the practice is legal.

In a Nov. 6, 2008, letter to then state Rep. Terry Musser (R-Black River Falls), deputy attorney general Raymond Taffora acknowledged a number of requests for just such an opinion, as well as a growing number of arrests for carrying firearms in plain view, mostly on the charge of disorderly conduct.

On behalf of an unnamed constituent, Musser had specifically asked for an opinion about the open carrying of firearms for personal defense, but Taffora told him there were prudent legal reasons for the attorney general not to get involved.


I wonder if a desire to be Governor some day is one of those "prudent legal reasons for the attorney general not to get involved"?

Quote:
First, he noted, state statutes provide that the attorney general can only provide formal opinions to the governor, the Legislature, state officers and agencies, corporation counsels, and district attorneys. The attorney general cannot issue formal opinions to cities, towns, villages or other municipal attorneys or private citizens.


Hmmm, okay so provide a formal opinion to the district attorneys that since

Quote:
the Wisconsin Supreme Court has determined that an otherwise reasonable exercise of police power cannot be invoked in a way that 'destroys,' 'frustrates,' or 'nullifies' the constitutional right to bear arms


open carry is perfectly lawful and <I>a civil right</i> and any LEOs or departments who act in such a way "that 'destroys,' 'frustrates,' or 'nullifies'" that right are to be brought up on charges for civil rights violations.

_________________
If the Government does not obey the Constitution, then what is Treason? -- Unknown


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 168 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group