Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:03 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 Reasonable force goes bad? 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:35 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
Minnesota law allows for a continuum of force to be used in self defense.

"Deadly force" -- shooting or stabbing or bludgeoning someone -- is allowed only when there is a legitimate fear of death or GBH, etc., etc.

"Reasonable force" is allowed in self defense in less-than-GBH situations. Pulling a gun may be, under some circumstances, reasonable force (to find out if it applies to your case, you'll have to wait for the jury decision).

I have a real problem with "don't draw unless you're ready to shoot." I understand being mentally prepared for the possibility, but the vast majority of DGUs end with no shots fired. We must be in the mindset that it may be necessary to fire, not that drawing starts an inevitable chain reaction ending in blood.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:49 am 
Raving Moderate
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:46 pm
Posts: 1292
Location: Minneapolis
Andrew Rothman wrote:
I have a real problem with "don't draw unless you're ready to shoot." I understand being mentally prepared for the possibility, but the vast majority of DGUs end with no shots fired. We must be in the mindset that it may be necessary to fire, not that drawing starts an inevitable chain reaction ending in blood.


I didn't see it as "ready" to shoot, but as "willing"- I might draw my weapon not wanting to shoot someone, hoping not to have to shoot someone, but willing to do so if that is the only level of force which will stop the attack. Given that, I don't think we have an inevitable chain reaction, but a series of steps, however small and however instantaneously we may move from one to the next.

_________________
I'm liberal, pro-choice, and I carry a gun. Any questions?

My real name is Jeremiah (go figure). ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:56 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
Jeremiah wrote:
Andrew Rothman wrote:
I have a real problem with "don't draw unless you're ready to shoot." I understand being mentally prepared for the possibility, but the vast majority of DGUs end with no shots fired. We must be in the mindset that it may be necessary to fire, not that drawing starts an inevitable chain reaction ending in blood.


I didn't see it as "ready" to shoot, but as "willing"- I might draw my weapon not wanting to shoot someone, hoping not to have to shoot someone, but willing to do so if that is the only level of force which will stop the attack. Given that, I don't think we have an inevitable chain reaction, but a series of steps, however small and however instantaneously we may move from one to the next.


Yup. It's all about steps, and that word "willing". It's the idea of having a trigger, and not in the gun sense.

What is the action that will cause the next step? That's the question your brain needs to be asking.

-Mark


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:57 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 6767
Location: Twin Cities
Yup. That's the the correct, nuanced response. Unfortunately, I think it often gets compressed, and people are left with the wrong, simplistic version.

_________________
* NRA, UT, MADFI certified Minnesota Permit to Carry instructor, and one of 66,513 law-abiding permit holders. Read my blog.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 5:04 pm 
Junior Member

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 7:48 pm
Posts: 4
Location: Inver Grove Heights
Wow I'm gone at work for a few hours and so many great points are discussed.

As far as what Andrew said...

Andrew Rothman wrote:
I have a real problem with "don't draw unless you're ready to shoot." I understand being mentally prepared for the possibility, but the vast majority of DGUs end with no shots fired. We must be in the mindset that it may be necessary to fire, not that drawing starts an inevitable chain reaction ending in blood.


That is right at the point of my main concern. I'll give a more specific example I discussed with a forum member today at lunch. Take the example below:

ruffelo wrote:
We were walking through the skyway system in Minneapolis, near St. Olaf's (maybe I can zero in the location tomorrow). I was fairly aware of our surroundings, but we were also engaged in conversation. I had noticed the man in a blue jacket standing up ahead in the street-overpass, but he seemed to be talking on his cell phone. As we entered this particular overpass, he stepped towards the middle with his hand inside his jacket and loudly commanded, "Don't Move!" It is worth noting that this was the moment I realized that no one else was within sight and he had glass and a brick wall behind him.

At this point I quickly scraped aside my coat and sweater and acquired a firm grip on my handgun (IWB - 3 o'clock), as I said "What!?!" I doubt he could actually see the gun. While reaching for my gun, I thrust my weak arm out in a 'halt' sign. I don't know exactly how everything happened so quickly, but it was just as I practice.

He seemed very surprised at the resistance and quickly said, "Naw, it's cool, it's cool." This attitude change, his eyes, and his quick turn to run made it obvious that he knew exactly what I had my hand on and this was not his 'first time.'


Now change this experience so that when ruffelo reached for his gun the BG turned towards and started walking closer. He may then have have drawn as a "reasonable force" response. Moreover if he waited to draw it may have become too late (need to draw if the BG is <20 feet away) to prepare for the increasing threat. If the BG then pulled his EMPTY hands from his pocked and jumped at ruffelo he may then have reasonable fear GBH or death because the gun is exposed and could be taken.

Drawing the gun is an act that cannot be undone. Would the act that may have been reasonable force at the time now by consitered an unreasonable escillation in force because new information became available (that his hands were empty)? Any lawyers have an opinion or experience?

Glkguy


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:53 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:37 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Whittier
IANAL, however . . .. I disagree with the premise of the question. It disregards the possibilty of retreat, when alking in the skyway, there is always an opportunity to go forward or back the way you came. The gun can be re holstered once a safe distance is achieved from the threat. Until the threat isn't a threat . . . there is no difference in the situation than when you'd first drawn. (Just because the BG didn't have anything in the jacket pocket doesn't mean the BG isn't carring IWB same as you) It isn't your job to assume one way or the other, it is your job to safely extract yourselves if you can and to use force if you have to.

_________________
Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy .” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:37 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
Macx wrote:
IANAL, however . . .. I disagree with the premise of the question. It disregards the possibilty of retreat, when alking in the skyway, there is always an opportunity to go forward or back the way you came. The gun can be re holstered once a safe distance is achieved from the threat. Until the threat isn't a threat . . . there is no difference in the situation than when you'd first drawn. (Just because the BG didn't have anything in the jacket pocket doesn't mean the BG isn't carring IWB same as you) It isn't your job to assume one way or the other, it is your job to safely extract yourselves if you can and to use force if you have to.


Not necessarily. Your duty is to retreat if possible. For example, if you are 5'10" and 325 pounds, and your attacker is 6'0" and 180 pounds, you aren't expected to be able to run away without him being able to catch you and cause you harm.

That's the theory. Would a jury of reasonable people see it that way? Who knows....

-Mark


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:40 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:37 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Whittier
Our hero still has his gun drawn until a safe distance away . .. a threat advancing on a person with a drawn firearm is obviously insane (which can be a force multiplier, man crazy folk can be strong!) or hopped up on something (which can be a force multiplier, man high folk can be strong!)

The threat of attack via
Quote:
he stepped towards the middle with his hand inside his jacket and loudly commanded, "Don't Move!"
transforms to an empty handed lunger . . . . I don't believe there is a point where either A. The attacker is still a threat or B. there is a possibility of retreat is not true. Either the BG has been a continous threat or there has been a break in the action where a tactical withdrawl (backing away gun stil drawn) is possible. Even if I was a good runner, I can't imagine turning my back on such a BG.

Incidently, when he "pulled his EMPTY hands from his pocked and jumped at ruffelo", it kinda makes a difference if this is "jumped at" like "see if I can get you to flinch and put a hole in the skyway floor, so you'll be the @$$" or is this "jumped" like "I'm gonna shove that peashooter where the sun don't shine" kinda intent/ action. At least I think it presents a difference.

_________________
Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy .” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:03 pm 
Wise Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm
Posts: 2782
Location: St. Paul
glkguy wrote:
If reasonable force (in the form of a drawn weapon pointed at the ground) was being used to prevent an attack, could continued aggression (running towards the gun) suggest that they intend to inflict great bodily harm or death?


YES.

_________________
President of AACFI, GOCRA, CCRN, and A2A


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reasonable force goes bad?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:02 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 810
Location: Northern MN
kimberman wrote:
glkguy wrote:
If reasonable force (in the form of a drawn weapon pointed at the ground) was being used to prevent an attack, could continued aggression (running towards the gun) suggest that they intend to inflict great bodily harm or death?


YES.



The thread may be locked now. :lol:

_________________
Proud, Service Oriented, Rural LEO, or "BADGED COWBOY"
Certified MN Carry Permit Instructor


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group