Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 5:15 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 Air travel to AZ 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2009 11:39 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 172
Location: Duluth
Carbide Insert wrote:
It's really no big deal. Don't blow it out of proportion.

Now, what is much more difficult is flying with my son. :roll:



Yeah guns are easy. You should try flying with a CPAP machine!

Also, have you ever watched the show Airline? Don't fly Southwest!!

_________________
Stay safe! Chuck


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 12:09 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:37 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Whittier
Nah, haven't seen airline, but free Southwest tickets are cheaper than driving the car. Can't be worse than Airtran or whatever that is that uses Atlanta as a hub . .. :roll: Hold us over night and tell us they'll comp us motel rooms (the whole flight), shuttle us to a motel that had no vacancy & then the customer service people were really nice and said they'd shuttle us to this other motel further out . .. . eventually we get there and they have no vacancy either, meanwhile the customer service people went home. We get shuttled back to the airport and it is pretty much shut down. A night on the benches listening to the "unattended bags. . . . " message every 12 minutes :evil: Are you talking about that kind of thing?

_________________
Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy .” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 5:14 am 
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 2:43 am
Posts: 371
Location: Anoka, MN
Macx wrote:
Nah, haven't seen airline, but free Southwest tickets are cheaper than driving the car. Can't be worse than Airtran or whatever that is that uses Atlanta as a hub . .. :roll: Hold us over night and tell us they'll comp us motel rooms (the whole flight), shuttle us to a motel that had no vacancy & then the customer service people were really nice and said they'd shuttle us to this other motel further out . .. . eventually we get there and they have no vacancy either, meanwhile the customer service people went home. We get shuttled back to the airport and it is pretty much shut down. A night on the benches listening to the "unattended bags. . . . " message every 12 minutes :evil: Are you talking about that kind of thing?


Ugh. 'Free' with those hassles? That's the kind of stuff you couldn't give me FREE to accept. (Yeah, I'd rather pay than deal with that much hassle)


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2009 10:33 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 124
Location: Twin Cities
Quote:
At the risk of thread drift, here's my favorite Stewie quote:

"The ruptured capillaries in your nose belie the clarity of your wisdom"


I've always been partial to "Mealy-mouthed crotch pheasant" myself.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:30 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:37 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Whittier
Southwest was GREAT! Our only hassles came from TSA getting a boner over our sealed in tamper proof, obviously un-tampered with Gerber brand baby food . . . on the way back.

After the TSA agents established that our sealed baby food was in original packaging and we didn't give a rat's kiester if they broke the seals because she was gonna eat it on the flight anyway. . . . they cut us loose.

All things considered, having a baby that needs to eat caused me more problems than taking a gun to AZ did. We didn't miss a flight though and the free tickets were a huge help as we have as much in our bank accounts right now as some of you have in your wallets. Tough times. Glad we know someone who was able to comp us some tickets. Everybody was great on all four flights (MPLS to Denver to Phoenix & back Phoenix to Denver to MPLS) shoot, they even tossed me a free Jack and Ginger on one of those flights . Really good folk. Southwest made a significant positive impression on us.

_________________
Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy .” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:37 am 
Poet Laureate
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:36 am
Posts: 760
Location: Hutchinson, MN
Macx wrote:
Our only hassles came from TSA getting a boner over our sealed in tamper proof, obviously un-tampered with Gerber brand baby food.
Macx wrote:
All things considered, having a baby that needs to eat caused me more problems than taking a gun to AZ did.

Told you. :mrgreen:

I'm thinking people really don't believe me even when I'm speak from experience. Not just this case specifically, but it's something I've gathered over the course of several unrelated threads where I've offered advice or personal experience in various different matters. :?

People come back and post like it was the most surprising thing ever that things happen just the way I outlined.
It's kind of disheartening... :(

Glad to hear you were pleased with your Southwest experience Macx!

_________________
It's not always easy these days to tell which of our two major political parties is the Stupid Party and which is the Evil Party...
But it remains true that from time to time they collaborate on something that's both stupid and evil and call it bipartisanship. -Thomas E. Woods Jr.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:18 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:37 pm
Posts: 1757
Location: Whittier
Yeah, in Minneapolis they used the sniffer on the milk bottles, looked at the seals on the babyfood and that was the end of it.

Phoenix on the other hand, TSA decided to do the full house, pat us down check all our carry on stuff & really hassle us. It was over the top, they stuck some kind of litmus papers in the bab'y milk but didn't use a sniffer. They knew we were running late, but needed to do a physical pat down on me. . . . my pregnant wife AND the baby, needed to make us keep our shoes off through the whole thing, and yadda, yadda. Of course all of that had racial undertones and they skated pretty close to the edge of completely inappropriate. We were fortunate our flight was just late enough for us to make it, had the plane been on time it woulda been a coin toss not a dice roll.

_________________
Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy .” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:37 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:00 pm
Posts: 373
You're not allowed to carry firearms on planes? I never get hassled when I carry my Glock 7! :lol:

_________________

In a big country dreams stay with you, like a lover's voice fires the mountainside. Stay alive.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:05 am 
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:12 pm
Posts: 289
You should have just had a TSA agent sneak the gun around the security checkpoint for you :D

Macx, I've had the exact same experience as you, flying out of MSP tends to be as painless as possible given the current security theater. Flying out of PHX however has been a pain nearly every time I'm through there.

I thought the idea of federalizing airport security was supposed to ensure a uniform application of security polices, clearly that hasn't happened.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:00 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:36 am
Posts: 702
Location: St. Paulish
Fubar wrote:
You should have just had a TSA agent sneak the gun around the security checkpoint for you :D

Or this guy.

_________________
Proud owner of 2 wonderful SGH holsters.
"If man will not work, he shall not eat" (2 Th 3:14)
"If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" -Jesus (Luke 22:36)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:13 am 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:56 pm
Posts: 1109
What if you carry guns on a private plane. Any special rules then?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:36 am 
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:39 pm
Posts: 20
Fubar wrote:
I thought the idea of federalizing airport security was supposed to ensure a uniform application of security polices, clearly that hasn't happened.

Part of any good security policy to to incorporate randomness and variety. When security practices are uniform and routine, holes in that security are more easily identified and exploited.

That does not necessarily mean this is what TSA is doing...


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:25 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:24 pm
Posts: 471
Location: 12 miles east of Lake Wobegon
JimC wrote:
What if you carry guns on a private plane. Any special rules then?


IIRC, the pilot has to know per part 91.

Joel has claimed that landing at an airport with part 121 operations while in a private plane and in possession of firearms is technically a violation of the sterile area rule, but I'm not entirely convinced.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:48 am 
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:12 pm
Posts: 289
trob09 wrote:
Part of any good security policy to to incorporate randomness and variety. When security practices are uniform and routine, holes in that security are more easily identified and exploited.

That does not necessarily mean this is what TSA is doing...
Heh, good point.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 279 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group