Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:29 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 4 posts ] 
 National Park Carry 
Author Message
 Post subject: National Park Carry
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:57 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:50 am
Posts: 125
Will soon be reversed. Obama team has a hold on it for approval by congress. Rarely used law to stop passed directive. do a search

_________________
"Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains." Winston Churchill


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:17 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:19 pm
Posts: 333
http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=421737

According to these guys, National Park carry is a done deal, and is not affected by Obama.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: The Rule Hold
PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:22 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:50 am
Posts: 125
How did you vote?

Obama orders freeze on Bush rules

President Barack Obama has made one of his first acts of office a freeze on all pending regulations issued by the previous administration. The White House memo puts the decisions of former President George W. Bush on hold until they can be reviewed by Obama's staff. The order went out shortly after Obama was inaugurated as president. Such orders are common to US presidential transitions and are used to counter last minute rules introduced by outgoing presidents. Controversial late rules by the outgoing Bush administration include allowing concealed weapons to be carried in some national parks
The memo also orders the withdrawal of all final or proposed regulations not yet published by the Federal Register. Department and agency heads have also been asked to "consider extending for 60 days the effective date of regulations that have been published in the Federal Register but not yet taken effect" unless they impact health, safety, environmental, financial, or national security matters -- obviously now subject to the interpretation of Obama's appointees.

_________________
"Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains." Winston Churchill


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:13 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:43 am
Posts: 208
Location: St. Cloud
Mmmmm... the caveat at the end of this sentence seems to imply the opposite; that he WON'T meddle with the things falling into these specific categories.

"The memo also orders the withdrawal of all final or proposed regulations not yet published by the Federal Register. Department and agency heads have also been asked to "consider extending for 60 days the effective date of regulations that have been published in the Federal Register but not yet taken effect" unless they impact health, safety, environmental, financial, or national security matters."

As for the 30-day window for codification of the final rule, it still looks like we got this one in and it should NOT be considered pending or subject to his 60-day extension.


[Federal Register: December 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 238)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 74966-74972]

[DOCID:fr10de08-8]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

36 CFR Part 2

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 27

RIN 1024-AD70


General Regulations for Areas Administered by the National Park
Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service

AGENCIES: Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service,
Interior.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rulemaking amends regulations codified in 36 CFR
part 2 and 50 CFR part 27, which pertain to the possession and
transportation of firearms in national park areas and national wildlife
refuges. The final rule updates these regulations to reflect state laws
authorizing the possession of concealed firearms, while leaving
unchanged the existing regulatory provisions that ensure visitor safety
and resource protection such as the prohibitions on poaching and
limitations on hunting and target practice.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 4 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group