|
|
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:29 pm
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Tabsr
|
Post subject: National Park Carry Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:57 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:50 am Posts: 125
|
Will soon be reversed. Obama team has a hold on it for approval by congress. Rarely used law to stop passed directive. do a search
_________________ "Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains." Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
motoman
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:17 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:19 pm Posts: 333
|
|
|
|
|
Tabsr
|
Post subject: The Rule Hold Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:22 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:50 am Posts: 125
|
How did you vote?
Obama orders freeze on Bush rules
President Barack Obama has made one of his first acts of office a freeze on all pending regulations issued by the previous administration. The White House memo puts the decisions of former President George W. Bush on hold until they can be reviewed by Obama's staff. The order went out shortly after Obama was inaugurated as president. Such orders are common to US presidential transitions and are used to counter last minute rules introduced by outgoing presidents. Controversial late rules by the outgoing Bush administration include allowing concealed weapons to be carried in some national parks
The memo also orders the withdrawal of all final or proposed regulations not yet published by the Federal Register. Department and agency heads have also been asked to "consider extending for 60 days the effective date of regulations that have been published in the Federal Register but not yet taken effect" unless they impact health, safety, environmental, financial, or national security matters -- obviously now subject to the interpretation of Obama's appointees.
_________________ "Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has not heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains." Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Long Ago LEO
|
Post subject: Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:13 pm |
|
Senior Member |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:43 am Posts: 208 Location: St. Cloud
|
Mmmmm... the caveat at the end of this sentence seems to imply the opposite; that he WON'T meddle with the things falling into these specific categories.
"The memo also orders the withdrawal of all final or proposed regulations not yet published by the Federal Register. Department and agency heads have also been asked to "consider extending for 60 days the effective date of regulations that have been published in the Federal Register but not yet taken effect" unless they impact health, safety, environmental, financial, or national security matters."
As for the 30-day window for codification of the final rule, it still looks like we got this one in and it should NOT be considered pending or subject to his 60-day extension.
[Federal Register: December 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 238)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 74966-74972]
[DOCID:fr10de08-8]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 2
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 27
RIN 1024-AD70
General Regulations for Areas Administered by the National Park
Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service
AGENCIES: Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rulemaking amends regulations codified in 36 CFR
part 2 and 50 CFR part 27, which pertain to the possession and
transportation of firearms in national park areas and national wildlife
refuges. The final rule updates these regulations to reflect state laws
authorizing the possession of concealed firearms, while leaving
unchanged the existing regulatory provisions that ensure visitor safety
and resource protection such as the prohibitions on poaching and
limitations on hunting and target practice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.
All times are UTC - 6 hours
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
|