Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 5:49 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7 posts ] 
 Mullery's H.F.497 
Author Message
 Post subject: Mullery's H.F.497
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:58 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 742
Location: Twin Cities
Kimberman, anyone else,
Do you know the rationale for Mullery's introduction of H.F. 497 yesterday?

Quote:
H.F. No. 497, as introduced - 86th Legislative Session (2009-2010) Posted on Feb 02, 2009

1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to government data practices; authorizing access to certain firearm data
1.3 by parole and probation authorities;amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section
1.4 13.87, by adding a subdivision.
1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

1.6 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 13.87, is amended by adding a subdivision
1.7 to read:
1.8 Subd. 5. Parole and probation authority access to records. Parole and county
1.9 probation authorities may access data identified in subdivision 2 on an applicant or permit
1.10 holder who is also a defendant, parolee, or probationer of a district court.


Is this just the first chink in a line of attempts to make purchase/transfer and permit data accessible more people for no good reasons? Or is there a story behind this that justifies the change?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:55 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
He tried that last year too.

It's pretty stupid. Which Sheriff is going to issue a permit to a convicted criminal who is still on parole or probation?

To me, it seems like a cheap shot at getting the permit holder database into non-LEO hands.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Last edited by DeanC on Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:57 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
Whoops - double-tap.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:03 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 4468
isn't this the other way around though. The PO wants to be able to check that his Parolee doesn't have a permit. Not all crimes lead to relinquishing the permit or firearms.

Silly and unnecessary as with or without a permit, their Parolee could go nuts.

_________________
Certified Carry Permit Instructor (MNTactics.com and ShootingSafely.com)
Click here for current Carry Classes
"There is no safety for honest men, except by believing all possible evil of evil men." - Edwin Burke


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:09 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
My thought was if the crime was serious enough to warrant parole or supervised probation, the Sheriff would revoke the permit anyhow.

Besides, the parolee who is going to kill his parole officer is probably not all that concerned about carrying legally anyhow.

At any rate, it just opens up unsupervised access to people who don't need it.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:23 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:13 pm
Posts: 1743
Location: Lakeville
DeanC wrote:
<...>Besides, the parolee who is going to kill his parole officer is probably not all that concerned about carrying legally anyhow.<...>

HA, what a novel thought!
QFT! (Quoted for Truth)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:30 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
Image
I don't know why, but I just can't help but put a face on this proposed legislation.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7 posts ] 

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group