As for that, it presents an unverifiable hypothesis, i.e. it calls for proof that could only be offered in the form of speculation. Example: Can you prove that more abolitionist activism in the Southern states could have steered the United States away from civil war? So it's moot. But, again, I kind of appreciate your reasoning.

And whatever the circumstance, it couldn't hurt to push one way or another against what's sure to be a reign of terror in the Attorney General's office.

Beyond a public campaign opposing Holder's confirmation, they could have pulled hard against Holder in a more private manner, like some hardball interfacing with members of Congress. And, besides, who can say this didn't happen?