Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:03 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 CSM crows over their "victory" over NRA in the Hou 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:35 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
JimC wrote:
So this bill is going to be law now? I thought it was dying


No, it was tabled. CSM is just being "selective" in their email. The amendment passed, but the bill then got tabled. No bill, no amendment.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:14 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:05 pm
Posts: 199
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Quote:
From 2004 to 2006, the
ATF made one arrest for every 1.6 gun shows investigated.


So if they investigated, say, one hundred gun shows, each of which attracted, conservatively, between 1,000 and 6,000 people, then from the overall group of 100,000 to 600,000 patrons they made, roughly, an astounding 62 arrests. As we know, about .062%

I'm curious to know the grand total cost of these investigations over two years.

_________________
"My name is Shosanna Dreyfus. This is the face of Jewish vengeance."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:25 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 1525
Location: Isanti, MN
More-over how many crime convictions :?: Compel them to extrapolate that to dollar cost.

_________________
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
- Winston Churchill -


WITHOUT LIBERTY THERE IS NO FREEDOM


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:28 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
Sietch wrote:
Quote:
From 2004 to 2006, the
ATF made one arrest for every 1.6 gun shows investigated.


So if they investigated, say, one hundred gun shows, each of which attracted, conservatively, between 1,000 and 6,000 people, then from the overall group of 100,000 to 600,000 patrons they made, roughly, an astounding 62 arrests. As we know, about .062%

I'm curious to know the grand total cost of these investigations over two years.


Let's also note that nowhere does it say that the arrests are gun-show related.

-Mark


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 1:15 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:05 pm
Posts: 199
Location: Twin Cities, MN
mrokern wrote:
Sietch wrote:
Quote:
From 2004 to 2006, the
ATF made one arrest for every 1.6 gun shows investigated.


So if they investigated, say, one hundred gun shows, each of which attracted, conservatively, between 1,000 and 6,000 people, then from the overall group of 100,000 to 600,000 patrons they made, roughly, an astounding 62 arrests. As we know, about .062%

I'm curious to know the grand total cost of these investigations over two years.


Let's also note that nowhere does it say that the arrests are gun-show related.

-Mark


You mean, like, they ran a plate in the parking lot and pulled up a warrant? Or something of the like? That's a VERY good point. And regardless of the nature of the arrests, how many convictions were they able to see through?

Of course, Heather is probably all over a corrected update letter at this very moment.

_________________
"My name is Shosanna Dreyfus. This is the face of Jewish vengeance."


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 1:21 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 1060
Location: Savage, MN
Quote:
From 2004 to 2006, the
ATF made one arrest for every 1.6 gun shows investigated.


I wonder what the arrest rate would be if they investigated welfare offices.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 1:26 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:40 pm
Posts: 2264
Location: Eden Prairie
Sietch wrote:
mrokern wrote:
Sietch wrote:
Quote:
From 2004 to 2006, the
ATF made one arrest for every 1.6 gun shows investigated.


So if they investigated, say, one hundred gun shows, each of which attracted, conservatively, between 1,000 and 6,000 people, then from the overall group of 100,000 to 600,000 patrons they made, roughly, an astounding 62 arrests. As we know, about .062%

I'm curious to know the grand total cost of these investigations over two years.


Let's also note that nowhere does it say that the arrests are gun-show related.

-Mark


You mean, like, they ran a plate in the parking lot and pulled up a warrant? Or something of the like? That's a VERY good point. And regardless of the nature of the arrests, how many convictions were they able to see through?

Of course, Heather is probably all over a corrected update letter at this very moment.


I'm willing to stretch and say that the label of "investigated" may mean just having a show on a list, and that the arrest count may have absolutely no relation to the show at all.

Let's play:

For sake of easy math (which seems to be the only type taught these days), let's say there were 25 gun shows in the Minneapolis metro last year. Let's say that there were 15,000 arrests made in the metro last year (yes, I know, that's even more amusing).

Oh my goodness, there were 600 arrests per gun show last year! Think of the children! The sky is falling! My head is up my ass and my proctologist is on vacation!

Remember, 87.59% of all statistics are pulled out of thin air. Just like that one. :lol:

-Mark


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 1:30 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 1525
Location: Isanti, MN
Lenny7 wrote:
I wonder what the arrest rate would be if they investigated welfare offices.


That could be construed as profiling.

_________________
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
- Winston Churchill -


WITHOUT LIBERTY THERE IS NO FREEDOM


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 10:15 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:36 pm
Posts: 129
Location: Elk River
Scott Hughes wrote:
Lenny7 wrote:
I wonder what the arrest rate would be if they investigated welfare offices.


That could be construed as profiling.


That would be the equivalent of a cop sitting outside a bar a closing, or setting up your deer stand on the trail between the swamp and the corn field.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 10:52 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:08 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Savage
Mattxd wrote:
Scott Hughes wrote:
Lenny7 wrote:
I wonder what the arrest rate would be if they investigated welfare offices.


That could be construed as profiling.


That would be the equivalent of a cop sitting outside a bar a closing, or setting up your deer stand on the trail between the swamp and the corn field.




NO BABYSITTING!!


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group