Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:38 am

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
 Defeating a taser BAN in Minnesota. 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:29 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 3:02 am
Posts: 816
Location: South of the River Suburbs
AGoodDay wrote:
jrp267 wrote:
I do think when a taser is used for compliance and the victim dies the officer should be charged with a crime such as murder in the 2nd degree. Officers should have to accept the responsiblity of using deadly force if it was not justified. Saying I didnt know they had a heart condition should not be acceptable. Kinda like saying I thought it was my taser when I shot the cuffed suspect in the back on the ground.

Just about everything the cops use kill people in similar ways and should result in murder charges for cops by that argument.
-Pepper spray can spike up allergic reactions, asthma or other breathing issues such as various forms of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases.
-Batons can miss, be dodged and strike an unintended target or perhaps blow a blood vessel on a hemophiliac.
-Handcuffs can cause positional asphyxiation
-Open hand techniques can cause stress to the heart (a heck of a lot more than a taser, btw), positional asphyxiation, suspects bodies and head can accidentally strike hard objects.

And those are only examples, in no way an exhaustive list of all of the ways that police tools can kill people. Take those away and you have two choices. Presence and asking politely or shooting. I think something between those two extremes is a good thing.


I guess the point I see in forcing a level of accountability upon the officers is that the worst of the door-kickers, kitten-stompers and assorted other jackbooted thugs would eventually be locked up and the remaining officers on the street might actually be trying to make the world a better place. Spread the word that door-kickers need not apply, you know?

Think about it... "Isolated Incidents" becoming a footnote in the annals of law enforcement history.

But unfortunately, I know I'm only dreaming. There will always be the laws that punish "us" while giving "them" more and more privaleges; at the same time our constitutional rights will continiously be erroded by the crowd that keeps using the same old tired excuses like "It's for officer safety", "it's for the public good", "it's for the children", " there were exigent circumstances", and so on ad nauseum...

_________________
My YouTube Videos

"We're either gonna be the best of friends or there's gonna be a whole lotta shootin' goin' on."

"I think it's a good thing for serving cops to mix with non-cops in a situation where they understand that they aren't in charge." -JoelR

"You'd be amazed at the things a bullet can stop." -Old Irish Proverb


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:34 am 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:06 pm
Posts: 666
Location: St Cloud
I have no problem with accountability. What I do have a problem with is taking away what has proven to be a very safe and effective tool. Are there abuses? Yes. If we apply accountability we should be able to significantly reduce abuses. (I don't believe that total elimination of abuses of anything is possible.) But accountability doesn't have to include taking away this tool, or charging officers with murder for unforeseeable events.

Am I off base here?

_________________
Try not. Do or do not, but do not try. - Yoda
Never give up. Never, never, never. - Churchill
Stand on the shoulders of your giant.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:50 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 124
Well in mn you have to accept the victim as they are when you commit a crime. So when the police ABUSE their power they should be charged with an applicable crime and not just reprimanded internally.

_________________
But if “bear
arms” means, as the petitioners and the dissent think, the
Opinion of the Court
carrying of arms only for military purposes, one simply
cannot add “for the purpose of killing game.” The right “to
carry arms in the militia for the purpose of killing game”
is worthy of the mad hatter.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 4:44 pm 
Journeyman Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:15 pm
Posts: 77
Location: Blaine, MN / Saint Cloud, MN
Lets take a C2 taser, X26 taser which is mostly used by law enforcement and the C2 by regular people. Each one of these TASERS are traceable by AFIDs in the taser cartridge that are dispersed in a wide range upon discharge. Also serial numbers on the cartridge and the taser itself that are traceable back to the person who owns the TASER. TASERs are way much more traced than stun guns, pepper spray and other tools.

I personally own a C2 and carry it as much as my XD9. I mainly have it incase a situation does not warrent me drawing my pistol on someone but a TASER handles the situation just fine. Also that part in the law that says a lesser force could be used.

_________________
A SCSU Grad, that carries XDs and C2 TASER.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:05 pm 
Wise Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm
Posts: 2782
Location: St. Paul
Nothing came of the 2007 proposal. We killed it behind the scenes.


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group