Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 10:29 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 Small revolver recommendation 
Author Message
 Post subject: Small revolver recommendation
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:02 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Posts: 104
Location: West Concord, MN (cat loving capital of SE MN)
I'm looking for a recommendation for a small carry revolver. I'm from the OTHER team and have very little practical experience with carry revolvers. I have heard of some featherweight options, maybe stainless in .357 mag. I have attempted to carry my Super Redhawk with the 9.5 inch barrel in a pocket carry style but haven't been able to make it out the door without the inevitable question of is that a banana in your pocket or are you just glad to see me. TIA =)

_________________
The world is full of idiots and I'm trying hard not to be one. =)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:10 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 4468
I have an airweight Taurus 85 which is a small J-Frame clone. I like it but would go S&W if I had it to do over just based on grip and accessory availability.

If I were buying today I'd look at the Carry Depot or Cabelas with their Visa promotion and get a Scandium 340PD. Image
Light, .357 Mg or .38, Hammerless, NICE. It's a handful to shoot for sure.

As a carried often, fired little backup piece that's light enough and small enough so you won't leave it in the safe it's a nice piece.

Personally, I'd recommend hammerless in any case (I bought mine with a hammer since I was learning... hindsight is 20/20)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Small revolver recommendation
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:27 am 
The Man
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am
Posts: 7970
Location: Minneapolis MN
MOTOBOB wrote:
I'm looking for a recommendation for a small carry revolver. I'm from the OTHER team and have very little practical experience with carry revolvers. I have heard of some featherweight options, maybe stainless in .357 mag. I have attempted to carry my Super Redhawk with the 9.5 inch barrel in a pocket carry style but haven't been able to make it out the door without the inevitable question of is that a banana in your pocket or are you just glad to see me. TIA =)
S&W 642; you'll see mine on every Forum page.

_________________
Just a guy.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:35 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm
Posts: 426
Location: Central MN
plblark wrote:
Personally, I'd recommend hammerless in any case (I bought mine with a hammer since I was learning... hindsight is 20/20)


Would you just get a hammerless so it wouldn't snag on your pockets? I will be getting a PD revolver. I am trying to decide if I want a hammer or not. I like the thought of being able to pull the hammer if I need to and have time. I also wouldn't want to be in a situation where I need to draw it fast and it catches on my pants and I lose.

Couldn't a person get used to "thumbing" the hammer when you draw? Then you could draw and cock the hammer in one motion. I guess it is one more thing to think about though. Thoughts?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:38 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm
Posts: 426
Location: Central MN
plblark wrote:
If I were buying today I'd look at the Carry Depot or Cabelas with their Visa promotion and get a Scandium 340PD.


forgot to ask... what is the visa promotion?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:44 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 4468
re: cabelas visa, I got the info here:
http://www.twincitiescarry.com/forum/vi ... hlight=252

re: hammerless and thumbing and etc, I'm just a newb myself and not an expert. I've had the hammer catch when taking it out at the range and if I'm in a SHTF situation where the gun is going to come into play I don't forsee having time to cock it anyway. Double action shooting on a revolver does take some getting used to.

I'd wait for some more experienced opinions and explanations.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:05 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:58 pm
Posts: 107
Location: St. Paul
I really like my S&W 638 Airweight also known as the "Bodyguard".

It's similar to Joel's 642 except it has a shrouded hammer intead of being totally hammerless. You have the option of single action or double action.

From the S&W website:

When you need a lightweight carry revolver, you turn to Smith & Wesson's Small Frame Airweight Series. They are the original aluminum, small frame revolvers chambered in .38 S&W Special +P.

They are available in three distinct hammer styles – the "Chiefs Special" with exposed hammer, the "Centennial" frame with fully enclosed hammer and the "Bodyguard" frame (.38 S&W Special +P only) shrouded hammer. Three styles with one idea...perfect personal protection.

www.smith-wesson.com


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:21 am 
The Man
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am
Posts: 7970
Location: Minneapolis MN
brauchma wrote:
plblark wrote:
Personally, I'd recommend hammerless in any case (I bought mine with a hammer since I was learning... hindsight is 20/20)


Would you just get a hammerless so it wouldn't snag on your pockets? I will be getting a PD revolver. I am trying to decide if I want a hammer or not. I like the thought of being able to pull the hammer if I need to and have time. I also wouldn't want to be in a situation where I need to draw it fast and it catches on my pants and I lose.

Couldn't a person get used to "thumbing" the hammer when you draw? Then you could draw and cock the hammer in one motion. I guess it is one more thing to think about though. Thoughts?
Okay. So you, in a situation that you think you need a gun out, draw and cock the hammer. Then, as in the majority of such situations, you find that you don't have to shoot.

It's pretty easy, normally, to lower a hammer safely; I'll not go through all five steps now.

But this isn't a normal sort of situation -- you took out the gun because something or somebody scared you badly enough that you thought you might get killed . . . your heart's beating like a triphammer*, fingers trembling from the adrenaline burst, blood flow's altered in your brain, sending more to the little lizard brain and less to the higher function centers . . .

And you really want to lower a hammer now? Are you sure?

_____________________________
*The little devil on my left shoulder is suggesting that I use another, more colorful, and perhaps perhaps not entirely kind turn of phrase involving a person banned from the Forum and a picture of a firearms instructor who doesn't post here; PM me if you want to hear from him.

_________________
Just a guy.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 11:42 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm
Posts: 426
Location: Central MN
joelr wrote:
brauchma wrote:
plblark wrote:
Personally, I'd recommend hammerless in any case (I bought mine with a hammer since I was learning... hindsight is 20/20)


Would you just get a hammerless so it wouldn't snag on your pockets? I will be getting a PD revolver. I am trying to decide if I want a hammer or not. I like the thought of being able to pull the hammer if I need to and have time. I also wouldn't want to be in a situation where I need to draw it fast and it catches on my pants and I lose.

Couldn't a person get used to "thumbing" the hammer when you draw? Then you could draw and cock the hammer in one motion. I guess it is one more thing to think about though. Thoughts?


And you really want to lower a hammer now? Are you sure?


Makes sense I guess.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:10 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:39 pm
Posts: 426
Location: Central MN
plblark wrote:
re: cabelas visa, I got the info here:
http://www.twincitiescarry.com/forum/vi ... hlight=252

re: hammerless and thumbing and etc, I'm just a newb myself and not an expert. I've had the hammer catch when taking it out at the range and if I'm in a SHTF situation where the gun is going to come into play I don't forsee having time to cock it anyway. Double action shooting on a revolver does take some getting used to.

I'd wait for some more experienced opinions and explanations.


WOW! I emailed the link to my wife! If that is going on still, I may buy one on my way to the "New Thing!"


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:19 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:53 pm
Posts: 1421
Location: South Minneapolis (East of Lake Nokomis)
Goalie & I had a mini-debate about thumb-cocking revolvers a few days ago. It was established that a hammerless revolver is best, i.e. that I was right and he was wrong. Well anyway that's the way I remember it. ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Small revolver recommendation
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:44 pm 
Raving Moderate
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:46 pm
Posts: 1292
Location: Minneapolis
MOTOBOB wrote:
I'm looking for a recommendation for a small carry revolver. I'm from the OTHER team and have very little practical experience with carry revolvers. I have heard of some featherweight options, maybe stainless in .357 mag. I have attempted to carry my Super Redhawk with the 9.5 inch barrel in a pocket carry style but haven't been able to make it out the door without the inevitable question of is that a banana in your pocket or are you just glad to see me. TIA =)


If stainless is a possibility, I'll put my .02 for a Ruger SP101. The one in my avatar (and my carry) is a 3" version with the exposed hammer, but the KSP-321XL model is a 2.25" barrel and "hammerless". Affordable, built like a bank vault- what's not to love?

_________________
I'm liberal, pro-choice, and I carry a gun. Any questions?

My real name is Jeremiah (go figure). ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:49 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:37 am
Posts: 606
Personally I think a bobbed hammer is a good way to go in a J-frame; if only so you'll look better at the range :wink:

Image


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:56 pm 
The Man
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am
Posts: 7970
Location: Minneapolis MN
squib_joe wrote:
Personally I think a bobbed hammer is a good way to go in a J-frame; if only so you'll look better at the range :wink:

Image
Nothing wrong with those; I've got a S&W Model 42 with a factory-bobbed hammer that I like quite a lot.

_________________
Just a guy.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Small revolver recommendation
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:25 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:53 pm
Posts: 1421
Location: South Minneapolis (East of Lake Nokomis)
Jeremiah wrote:
If stainless is a possibility, I'll put my .02 for a Ruger SP101. The one in my avatar (and my carry) is a 3" version with the exposed hammer, but the KSP-321XL model is a 2.25" barrel and "hammerless". Affordable, built like a bank vault- what's not to love?
That's exactly what I carry. It's 25 oz. which makes it maybe the heaviest 'J-frame-class' revolver out there, but that's not all bad if you're going to shoot .357 magnum ammo, as anybody who's shot magnum ammo out of a super-light alloy snubby will tell you! Even so, the first time I shot .357 through it, I went out and bought the cushy Hogue monogrip the next day.
Image


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group