Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:19 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 The unexplained Ka-booooooom - explained? 
Author Message
 Post subject: The unexplained Ka-booooooom - explained?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:45 am 
Wise Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:48 pm
Posts: 2782
Location: St. Paul
CATASTROPHIC FAILURE OF SEMIAUTOMATIC HANDGUNS

The continuous reloading and chambering of the same round may cause catastrophic failure in semiautomatic handguns.

Current Information - The Security Force at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico, recently reported on the catastrophic failure of a semiautomatic handgun when it was fired. The internal explosion caused the frame to break while the slide and barrel separated from the weapon and traveled down range. No one was injured in the incident. An investigation revealed that security personnel were repeatedly charging same round of ammunition into the chamber.

Technical personnel at Glock, Inc. advise that repeated chambering of the same round may cause the bullet to move deeper in the casing, further compacting the propellant. When a normal cartridge is fired, the firing pin hits the primer, igniting the propellant. When the propellant burns, the gas pressure drives the bullet out of the case and down the barrel. However, if the propellant has been compacted, the pressure may increase beyond the gun’s specifications, causing the weapon to break apart.

Sigarms, Inc.’s personnel confirm that reloading the same round five or six times will cause problems, noting that reloading the same round even once will void their warranty. Both manufacturers stress that the problem is not with the gun, but with chambering the same round repeatedly...


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:09 pm 
The Man
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:43 am
Posts: 7970
Location: Minneapolis MN
Interesting.

Orthogonally, we ran into the opposite sort of problem last Sunday, when I was doing some quals down at Burnsville. My 642 repeatedly jammed with Blazer .38s. Upon examination, it became clear that the crimp wasn't just inadequate, but missing -- bullets got pulled enough to prevent the cylinder from rotating.

_________________
Just a guy.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:09 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
Yep - combine that with a less-than-fully supported chamber and you get this:
Image

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:24 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:36 pm
Posts: 105
Location: Lakeville, MN
DeanC wrote:
Yep - combine that with a less-than-fully supported chamber and you get this


Ouch, how's your trigger finger?

_________________
R E M E M B E R - 9 . 11 . 01


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:26 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 4468
joelr wrote:
Interesting.

Orthogonally, we ran into the opposite sort of problem last Sunday, when I was doing some quals down at Burnsville. My 642 repeatedly jammed with Blazer .38s. Upon examination, it became clear that the crimp wasn't just inadequate, but missing -- bullets got pulled enough to prevent the cylinder from rotating.


I'd heard of that even with good crimps in the Scandium .357 Magnums but in .38 ... scary.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:47 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
ryanj wrote:
Ouch, how's your trigger finger?

That's not mine.

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:31 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 103
I had just recently read an article in one of the gun rags warning about that very thing. I think the article was on reloading the 9mm...

So what's a guy to do with the previously loaded round? Check the OAL? If the length is okay I'd assume it would be okay to rechamber again? Or if it's not, pull the bullet and reload it? I just can't see myself disposing of every round I clear after an IDPA course or pin shoot.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:46 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
Check the OAL. I'd also get a match cartridge gauge.

Just drop the cartridge in and see if it fits. If it doesn't fit, you've got issues.

Image

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:00 pm 
1911 tainted
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:47 pm
Posts: 3045
DeanC wrote:
Check the OAL. I'd also get a match cartridge gauge.

Just drop the cartridge in and see if it fits. If it doesn't fit, you've got issues.

Image


A match cartridge gauge would check if a cartridge is too long, that isn't the apparent problem. If the bullet was pushed into the case, the cartridge guage will not do any good but pressure would be higher than normal. A round that has been chambered many time can have the bullet pushed deeper into the case and you would have to measure with a calipers to check that.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:06 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 4:32 pm
Posts: 1803
Location: Woodbury
WARNING......OFF TOPIC

Love the new avatar Pred!! 8) 8)


We now resume our shedyuled programming.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:06 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 103
Thanks Brit.

Anyway, I guess it would be unlikely that my practice ammo would be chambered more than twice. I suppose it's the carry ammo that would more likely be chambered and rechambered over and over again.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:16 am 
Longtime Regular

Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:54 pm
Posts: 1941
Location: N 44°56.621` W 093°11.256 (St Paul)
Pred wrote:
I suppose it's the carry ammo that would more likely be chambered and rechambered over and over again.


That's exactly what you don't want problems with,
especially self incurred...... :shock:

I tend to shoot off carry ammo weekly,
of course it's .45 ball,
which is also what I practice with too .......... :lol:

.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:17 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 8:52 pm
Posts: 826
Location: MN
Most of the problems are with the .40 S&W. It's a high pressure round with little margin for error. Add a chamber that is not fully supported and you have an accident waiting to happen. I notice my XD40 tends to "shorten" the rounds after about two chamberings so I make sure I shoot those slightly shorter rounds at the range before they become a problem.

The .45 acp is a low pressure round and not quite as critical if the bullet seats a little deeper.

_________________
Ron
NRA Life Member
USS Bristol DD857
_________________________

If life was fair, Robins couldn't eat worms...


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:55 am 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:37 am
Posts: 198
Location: Oak Grove, MN
joelr wrote:
Interesting.

Orthogonally, we ran into the opposite sort of problem last Sunday, when I was doing some quals down at Burnsville. My 642 repeatedly jammed with Blazer .38s. Upon examination, it became clear that the crimp wasn't just inadequate, but missing -- bullets got pulled enough to prevent the cylinder from rotating.


I've had the exact same problem. Same gun, same ammo. No more Blazer ammo for me. Does Winchester do white box .38?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 10:14 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:25 am
Posts: 1772
Location: North Central Texas (now)
I have an H&K USP Compact in .40 S&W. I chamber a round and it stays there until it's fired. So far, that only happens at the range. I can see it now, the Government will require no rounds to be chambered for those security guards, military not in combat, DOD Police, etc.

_________________
A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have. - Barry Goldwater

"...quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est." [...a sword never kills anybody; it's a tool in the killer's hand.] -- (Lucius Annaeus) Seneca "the Younger" (ca. 4 BC-65 AD),

The Nanny State MUST DIE!!!


Offline
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group