Index  •  FAQ  •  Search  

It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:29 pm

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 7.62x39mm 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:25 am 
Designated waste of protoplasm
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 1807
Location: Western Burbs of MPLS
One reason not to copy them was geopolitical. During the Cold War, there were three blocs--the Communist, the "West" and the non-aligned. The Communist bloc dictated that armed forces would use the 7.62x39 cartridge and some variant of AK47. The West chose the 7.62x54 (.308) and, later. the 5.54 that we all know.

Hate to be a NIT picker

we use the 7.62x51mm (.308 Win) and prior to that the 7.62x63mm (30-06)

The Ar is 5.56x45mm Mil Designator the M855 (Ammunition now issued)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:27 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:44 pm
Posts: 842
Location: Phillips Neighborhood Minneapolis
Thanks for picking the nits. Really. :)

I shouldn't post without a net underneath. :oops:

_________________
http://web.me.com/bdwilliams44/Site/Blank.html


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:35 am 
Designated waste of protoplasm
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 1807
Location: Western Burbs of MPLS
I am sorry I meant to PM that to you.

Remember - I tal kabout this stuff ALL DAY - was just on the phone wiht an overseas ballistics researcher looking for infrormation.

SO - This is what I do - and about all that I do. ALL DAY EVERY DAY 24/7/365

BORING>


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:39 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:44 pm
Posts: 842
Location: Phillips Neighborhood Minneapolis
Not to worry. I am recovering from stomach flu and posted without proper regard for looking at something called "data" before posting. I'll go take my pills and then I'll be much better. :? Yeah, right.

_________________
http://web.me.com/bdwilliams44/Site/Blank.html


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:54 pm 
Designated waste of protoplasm
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 1807
Location: Western Burbs of MPLS
Hope you feel better.

Stomach FLU Blows...


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:11 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 5270
Location: Minneapolis
Pinnacle wrote:
Stomach FLU Blows...


Well, that's obvious Image

Now, what about the 5.45 x 39mm; the new Com-bloc round?

_________________
I am defending myself... in favor of that!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:20 pm 
Designated waste of protoplasm
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:41 pm
Posts: 1807
Location: Western Burbs of MPLS
Another .22 - but with a good bullet that was well designed.

It is viscious - but still another .22 and not as plentiful as the .30 Cal round.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 6:14 pm 
Forum Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:55 pm
Posts: 986
DeanC wrote:
Now, what about the 5.45 x 39mm; the new Com-bloc round?


Has anyone outside of Russia actually adopted it? My guess would be "no", and I wouldn't be surprised if the old 7.62x39 guns didn't outnumber the new ones by 10:1 in Russian arsenals.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2006 10:00 pm 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:37 am
Posts: 606
mobocracy wrote:
DeanC wrote:
Now, what about the 5.45 x 39mm; the new Com-bloc round?


Has anyone outside of Russia actually adopted it? My guess would be "no", and I wouldn't be surprised if the old 7.62x39 guns didn't outnumber the new ones by 10:1 in Russian arsenals.


East Germany, Poland, and Bulgaria ... among others .. switched to the AK-74 using the 5.45


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:31 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:06 am
Posts: 126
Location: Cottage Grove
6.8Rem SPC


Anyone?


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:37 am 
Longtime Regular
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 4:32 pm
Posts: 1803
Location: Woodbury
History Channel last week had the top 10 battle rifles.

1. AK and it's variants
2. AR and it's variants
3. SMLE (Short Magazine Lee Enfield)

A bolt gun out scored the FAL G3 Stg 44 Garand 1903 M14 Mauser


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:50 pm 
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:48 pm
Posts: 429
Location: Minnetonka
7.62x39 works just fine up close, which is more than I will say about the poodle shooter we currently deploy with our troops.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

This is a static archive the Twin Cities Carry forum, maintained as a public service by the current forum of record, The Minnesota Carry Forum.

All times are UTC - 6 hours


 Who is online 

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


 
Index  |  FAQ  |  Search

phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group